You are hereBiblio / PENERAPAN HUKUM TERHADAP GUGATAN REKONVENSI PADA PUTUSAN HAKIM NOMOR 17/Pdt. G/2007/PN. Pbg.
PENERAPAN HUKUM TERHADAP GUGATAN REKONVENSI PADA PUTUSAN HAKIM NOMOR 17/Pdt. G/2007/PN. Pbg.
|Judul||PENERAPAN HUKUM TERHADAP GUGATAN REKONVENSI PADA PUTUSAN HAKIM NOMOR 17/Pdt. G/2007/PN. Pbg.|
|Year of Publication||2012|
|Advisor||Drs. Antonius Sidik Maryono, S. H. MS, Rahadi Wasi Bintoro, S. H. MH|
|Academic Department||Fakultas Hukum UNSOED|
|University||UNIVERSITAS JENDERAL SOEDIRMAN|
The suit is a counterclaim against the defendants countered opponents litigants. Arrangements regarding the lawsuit counterclaim contained in Article 132 a and 132 b Herziene Inlandsch Reglement (HIR). Regulation of the counterclaim in a lawsuit is the both article is limited to a few things, namely understanding, the right of defendant to counterclaim filed, the filing and examination procedure in court. In fact, the case of a lawsuit counterclaim undergone many developments that Article 132 a and 132 b HIR can no longer accommodate it, therefore it appears the rules of the counterclaim in a lawsuit out of HIR, including in the jurisprudence and doctrine. One of the developments contained in the counterclaim lawsuit in Decision No. 17/Pdt. G/2007/PN. PBG. In the lawsuit counterclaim against the plaintiff not only addressed the Convention (early) as opposed to the litigants, but further action is also addressed to the Defendants counterclaim I of the Convention (early) in a way to seat Defendant Defendant Also I of the Convention as a counterclaim. Basically the law of civil procedure do not know the term Participate counterclaim defendant